From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
Date: | 2015-03-19 15:12:11 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob+y0kY_rqXOVeDhTw5xwmAQi92t0OGgEQW6CwemkjVkA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Patch fixes the problem and now for Rescan, we don't need to Wait
> for workers to finish.
>
>> Assuming this actually fixes the problem, I think we should back-patch
>> it into 9.4.
>
> +1
OK, done.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-03-19 15:21:45 | flags argument for dsm_create |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-03-19 14:49:09 | Re: assessing parallel-safety |