| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Check-out mutable functions in check constraints |
| Date: | 2019-07-15 14:20:48 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob+qZyoV90mVJXzm2AjyiXKv9F_fVQSWTqneU9iDuG-dw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 11:17 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> If the spec is allowing this because it can be seen
> to be safe, why should we not allow other cases that the user has
> taken the trouble to prove to themselves are safe? (If their proof is
> wrong, well, it wouldn't be the first bug in anyone's SQL application.)
Well said.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-07-15 14:24:19 | Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-07-15 14:18:55 | Re: SHOW CREATE |