| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Alpha2/Beta1 |
| Date: | 2015-07-22 14:31:32 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob+0DnT9ggY-5Qs9RAfygRJF5ZywyKLB6F=k6OWGmv9Ow@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On 2015/07/22 12:40, Noah Misch wrote:
>> I vote for alpha2. Comparing the "Open Issues" and "resolved after
>> 9.5alpha1"
>> sections of https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items,
>> we've
>> not transitioned to a qualitatively different level of API stability.
>
> +1 for alpha2.
+1 for alpha2 from me as well. We have made some progress but there
is an awful lot of stuff left to get fixed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-07-22 14:34:41 | Re: ALTER TABLE .. ADD PRIMARY KEY .. USING INDEX has dump-restore hazard |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-07-22 14:29:44 | Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? |