Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:00 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I guess we could do that, but how about just always displaying two
> decimal places? I feel like you're really worried that people will be
> confused if the row count is not an integer, but I'm not sure anyone
> else has echoed that concern, and I am doubtful that it's really a
> problem. Either people don't understand that the row count is divided
> through by nloops, in which case the decimal places might actually
> give them a clue that they've misunderstood, or they do understand
> that, in which case the decimal places are not confusing. I feel like
> we've gone to a lot of trouble to come up with complex solutions --
> what was actually committed was one of the simpler things proposed --
> but I am still not convinced that the simplest solution isn't for the
> best.

So here's a patch for that. Thoughts?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com