| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_shmem_allocations view |
| Date: | 2014-08-18 17:12:37 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoazzAB7XfOGurbTj+456jtEAbqMJ+bvDTwWe7EQeWw1LQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2014-08-18 12:50:27 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> > You realize that you can pretty much recompute the offsets from the
>> > sizes of the individual allocations anyway?
>>
>> Sure, if you know the segment base. Do you?
>
> Err? The offset doesn't give you the base either?
Oh!
I thought you were printing actual pointer addresses. If you're just
printing offsets relative to wherever the segment happens to be
mapped, I don't care about that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-08-18 17:20:44 | Re: Reporting the commit LSN at commit time |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-08-18 17:10:49 | Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes |