From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, pokurev(at)pm(dot)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, bannos(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp |
Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. |
Date: | 2016-03-24 13:01:06 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoawxGgsxjoj2BygUCNC1LF9kdxrHXMEDyCPNuBoLB1rSQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Server crash was reported on running vacuum progress checker view on 32-bit
> machine.
> Please find attached a fix for the same.
>
> Crash was because 32 bit machine considers int8 as being passed by reference
> while creating the tuple descriptor. At the time of filling the tuple store,
> the code (heap_fill_tuple) checks this tuple descriptor before inserting the
> value into the tuple store. It finds the attribute type pass by reference
> and hence it treats the value as a pointer when it is not and thus it fails
> at the time of memcpy.
>
> This happens because appropriate conversion function is not employed while
> storing the value of that particular attribute into the values array before
> copying it into tuple store.
>
> - values[i+3] =
> UInt32GetDatum(beentry->st_progress_param[i]);
> + values[i+3] =
> Int64GetDatum(beentry->st_progress_param[i]);
>
>
> Attached patch fixes this.
Uggh, what a stupid mistake on my part.
Committed. Thanks for the patch.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-24 13:01:48 | Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. |
Previous Message | Rahila Syed | 2016-03-24 12:45:06 | Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. |