From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation |
Date: | 2012-02-29 21:34:24 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoavBOHBaKCXaDJXZkTc-+as2S56dVpy2QCD=Cc6U5ftLg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> OK, I have implemented both Roberts and Àlvaro's ideas in my patch.
> I only add the .old suffix to pg_controldata when link mode is used, and
> I now do it after the schema has been created (the most common failure
> case for pg_upgrade), and just before we actually link files --- both
> very good ideas.
Thanks for working on this. I think this will be a significant
usability improvement.
Any ideas about improving the error reporting more generally, so that
when reloading the dump fails, the user can easily see what went
belly-up, even if they didn't use -l?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-02-29 21:34:27 | Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-02-29 21:24:27 | Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 |