From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: refresh materialized view concurrently |
Date: | 2013-07-03 14:59:09 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoau4RrNiTNcEL6q3RKmFBn7JufEeuGieJF+6YOW0EEM6Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> I don't believe that that happens. If it does, it's a bug. Either the
>>> planner or the executor should be taking a lock on each index touched
>>> by a query.
>
>> It seems Kevin's right. Not sure why that doesn't break.
>
> Are we somehow not going through ExecOpenIndices?
I dunno. I just did a quick black-box test:
CREATE TABLE foo (a int primary key);
BEGIN;
INSERT INTO foo VALUES (1);
SELECT relation::regclass, locktype, mode, granted FROM pg_locks;
I get:
relation | locktype | mode | granted
----------+---------------+------------------+---------
pg_locks | relation | AccessShareLock | t
foo | relation | RowExclusiveLock | t
| virtualxid | ExclusiveLock | t
| transactionid | ExclusiveLock | t
No foo_pkey anywhere.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-07-03 15:08:01 | Re: Add more regression tests for ASYNC |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-07-03 14:47:40 | Re: refresh materialized view concurrently |