Re: Potential GIN vacuum bug

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Potential GIN vacuum bug
Date: 2015-10-02 20:44:48
Message-ID: CA+TgmoatmXk__z1xzwZn2ddHWorxZ+4j_buk9VkyFCJ36xWOAA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Is the locking around indexes summarized someplace?

Not to my knowledge. :-(

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-10-02 20:47:09 Re: row_security GUC, BYPASSRLS
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-10-02 20:44:03 Re: CustomScan support on readfuncs.c