From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Richa Rathore <richayuvasoft161(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres-Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Want a routine vacuum for postgres |
Date: | 2016-09-22 20:57:02 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoat_LDWsL4vXnvxhkvicofOPFYXMCwt-G7GeukF+mUVuw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Richa Rathore
<richayuvasoft161(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> As i can see when i am running some process so it is creating the file in
> /usr/local/pgsql/data/base/16385/22596 which are more then 50mb . it was
> doing my memory and cpu full. so can you please suggest me what will be the
> better option for creating the space in memory. it is in digital ocean and
> when i run VACUUM FULL command it deleted whole my data so can you help me
> for routine maintain of pg data without disturbing my important data.
> Thanks in advance
This report isn't really clear enough for anybody to help you, but it
is expected that VACUUM FULL will rewrite your data in a new file.
You might find this blog post helpful:
http://rhaas.blogspot.com/2014/03/vacuum-full-doesnt-mean-vacuum-but.html
Also, this doesn't seem to be a bug report. Ask general usage
questions on pgsql-general, not the bugs list - or contact one of the
PostgreSQL support companies for assistance.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-09-22 21:34:29 | Re: BUG #14314: Mismatch of comment of a function. |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-09-22 20:54:19 | Re: 9.6rc1 Background worker starting multiple times |