Re: Defaults for replication/backup

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Defaults for replication/backup
Date: 2016-04-21 17:20:04
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaohvVD27dP5e=pfMjOYqbnxafvU3B5C5R7WsQONr=o-g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> So what more do we need to just get going with this? Given feature freeze
> we're perhaps too late to actually build the parameter feature for initdb,
> but we could still change the defaults (and then we could add such a
> parameter for next release).

I think we are far too close to beta1 to begin bikeshedding this.
Changing the defaults is not going to be uncontroversial, and it's not
something I think we should rush into.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-04-21 17:29:15 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move each SLRU's lwlocks to a separate tranche.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-04-21 17:10:46 Re: Parser extensions (maybe for 10?)