| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Access method extendability |
| Date: | 2015-09-08 17:36:23 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaoPrU2Ni1p=8wT9TYWdKnt6MZGSZX_rt2s9nzY98Y+1w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> wrote:
> Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>
>> On 2015-09-07 17:41, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>>>
>>> Some notices:
>>>
>>> 1) create-am.3.patch.gz
>>> As I understand, you didn't add schema name to access method. Why?
>>> Suppose, if we implement SQL-like interface for AM screation/dropping
>>> then we should provide a schema qualification for them
>>
>>
>> Why would access methods need to be schema qualified?
>
>
> Opfamily and opclass could be schema-qualified.
So what?
Making access methods schema-qualified seems like a completely
separate project, and an unnecessary one.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-09-08 17:38:14 | Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2015-09-08 17:32:52 | Re: gin_fuzzy_search_limit and postgresql.conf.sample |