Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question about meaning of information for explain.depesz.com

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hubert Lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question about meaning of information for explain.depesz.com
Date: 2017-12-19 20:30:07
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoan0YTYw3hbm=2UVdzPR2QdyH1F6HuZt+3ZqjumRvqJRw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Well, not really, because the context surrounding the lines you've
> added seems to refer to SQL that I can't find in join.sql or anywhere
> else in the tree. So my suspicion is that this patch is based on your
> parallel hash patch set rather than master.

Thomas pinged me off-list and showed patch -p1 < $file working fine
for him and ... I'm dumb. I was trying to apply the patch to v10, not
master. It applies fine to master; committed there.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Zhidenkov 2017-12-19 20:37:52 Re: genomic locus
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2017-12-19 20:21:31 Re: genomic locus