Re: statement_timeout is not working as expected with postgres_fdw

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Suraj Kharage <suraj(dot)kharage(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: statement_timeout is not working as expected with postgres_fdw
Date: 2017-05-06 17:11:58
Message-ID: CA+TgmoamON2js4EjQzJhP7Pzq8On0n9dT4bHPJsozCUHq4AnVQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Oh! Good catch. Given that the behavior in question is intentional
> there and intended to provide backward compatibility, changing it in
> back-branches doesn't seem like a good plan. I'll adjust the patch so
> that it continues to ignore errors in that case.

Updated patch attached.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
improve-pgfdw-abort-behavior-v2.patch application/x-patch 14.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-05-06 17:15:25 Re: Draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-05-06 17:01:03 Re: "CURRENT_ROLE" is not documented