Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode
Date: 2017-03-22 13:39:20
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoam=42VBHNh+6A57GRKXRJ2nNnNk6j331Vi2z=kH161jg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Off-list by accident. Re-adding the list.

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Amit Langote
>> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> Attached updated patches.
>>
>> Committed 0001 after removing a comma.
>
> Regarding 0002, I notice this surprising behavior:
>
> rhaas=# create table foo (a int, b text) partition by list (a);
> CREATE TABLE
> rhaas=# select relfilenode from pg_class where oid = 'foo'::regclass;
> relfilenode
> -------------
> 16385
> (1 row)
>
> Why do we end up with a relfilenode if there's no storage? I would
> have expected to see 0 there.
>
> Other than that, there's not much to see here. I'm a little worried
> that you might have missed some case that can result in an access to
> the file, but I can't find one. Stuff I tried:
>
> VACUUM
> VACUUM FULL
> CLUSTER
> ANALYZE
> CREATE INDEX
> ALTER TABLE .. ALTER COLUMN .. TYPE
> TRUNCATE
>
> It would be good to go through and make sure all of those - and any
> others you can think of - are represented in the regression tests.
>
> Also, a documentation update is probably in order to explain that
> we're not going to accept heap_reloptions on the parent because the
> parent has no storage; such options must be set on the child in order
> to have effect.
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mithun Cy 2017-03-22 13:43:24 Re: Possible regression with gather merge.
Previous Message Surafel Temesgen 2017-03-22 13:34:53 Re: New CORRESPONDING clause design