Re: A typo in syncrep.c

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Hello, I think I found a typo in a comment of syncrep.c.
>
>> * acknowledge the commit nor raise ERROR or FATAL. The latter would
>> - * lead the client to believe that that the transaction aborted, which
>> * is not true: it's already committed locally. The former is no good
>
> The 'that' looks duplicate.

Agreed.

> And it might be better to put a
> be-verb before the 'aborted'.
>
>> + * lead the client to believe that the transaction is aborted, which

No, that's correct the way it is. What you're proposing wouldn't
exactly be wrong, but it's a little less clear and direct.

Committed the part of your patch that removes the extra "that".

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company