From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Date: | 2013-02-21 13:05:29 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoajyWDF=+8p1=R51soMqtJ+p25xwTfOC_zgg_UMLCreSQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> More generally, I would consider the invalidation of a materialized view
>> a DDL command, whereas truncating a table is a DML command.
>
> That's not entirely true. From the database's point of view, TRUNCATE
> is in many ways actually DDL.
>
> I actually don't really dislike using "TRUNCATE" for this command.
Me neither. I'm astonished that we're seriously considering adding
new keywords for this.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-02-21 13:20:11 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-02-21 11:43:37 | pgsql: Teach MSVC build system about postgres_fdw. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-02-21 13:20:11 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-02-21 11:27:48 | Re: posix_fadvise missing in the walsender |