Re: [Windows,PATCH] Use faster, higher precision timer API

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Fabris Giovanni Consulente <cons(dot)FabrisGiovanni(at)sia(dot)eu>
Subject: Re: [Windows,PATCH] Use faster, higher precision timer API
Date: 2014-10-23 19:21:56
Message-ID: CA+TgmoajJvruv-yytkihJuhq0mChn_zK3-2yGMQd9NtB8ZcQrw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:41 AM, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Here's an updated patch addressing David's points.
>> I haven't had a chance to test it yet, on win2k8 or win2k12 due to
>> pgconf.eu .
>>
> Hi Craig, thanks for the fast turnaround.
>
> I've just had a look over the patch again:
>
> + DWORD errcode = GetLastError();
> + Assert(errcode == ERROR_PROC_NOT_FOUND);
>
> I'm not a big fan of this. It seems quite strange to be using Assert in this
> way.

Agreed - I think if you want an error check here it should use elog()
or ereport(), not Assert().

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-10-23 19:31:44 Re: ltree::text not immutable?
Previous Message Joe Van Dyk 2014-10-23 18:59:12 ltree::text not immutable?