On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 3:06 AM Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think that this patch is basically correct, except that it's not
>> correct to set mqh_counterparty_attached when receiver is still NULL.
>> Here's a v2 where I've attempted to correct that while preserving the
>> essence of your proposed fix.
>
> This looks good to me,
Thanks for checking. Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com