| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: using an end-of-recovery record in all cases |
| Date: | 2022-04-19 12:30:26 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaioFgonZPyT+47UipRKMQMgmQ43a=Kh0sJj1=MTmS9Zg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 11:56 PM Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think RequestCheckpoint() should be called conditionally. What is the need
> of the checkpoint if we haven't been through the recovery, in other words,
> starting up from a clean shutdown?
Good point. v5 attached.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v5-0001-Remove-the-end-of-recovery-checkpoint-in-all-case.patch | application/octet-stream | 19.5 KB |
| v5-0002-Remove-previous-timeline-ID-from-checkpoint.patch | application/octet-stream | 14.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2022-04-19 12:35:57 | Re: Patch a potential memory leak in describeOneTableDetails() |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2022-04-19 12:00:25 | Re: postgres_fdw: batch inserts vs. before row triggers |