Re: pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server
Date: 2017-07-24 16:28:06
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoah2c7CiB8N8nugAN5aaLqWL19ft5kuTxJzqZ1bXKHNOw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:40 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> Before reviewing the patch, I would note that it looks like this issue was
> introduced in b6a323a8c before the 9.6 release. The documentation states
> that the pg_stop_backup() function will wait for all required WAL to be
> archived, which corresponds to the default in the new patch of
> waitforarchive = true. The commit notes that the documentation needs
> updating, but since that didn't happen I think we should consider this a bug
> in 9.6 and back patch.
>
> While this patch brings pg_stop_backup() in line with the documentation, it
> also introduces a behavioral change compared to 9.6. Currently, the default
> 9.6 behavior on a standby is to return immediately from pg_stop_backup(),
> but this patch will cause it to block by default instead. Since action on
> the master may be required to unblock the process, I see this as a pretty
> significant change. I still think we should fix and backpatch, but I wanted
> to point this out.

Hmm. That seems to me like it could break backup scripts that are
currently working, which seems like a *very* unfriendly thing to do in
a minor release, especially since 9.6 has no option to override the
default behavior (nor can we add one, since it would require a change
to catalog contents).

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2017-07-24 16:28:31 Re: pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-07-24 16:19:54 Re: segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call