Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions
Date: 2024-04-22 13:25:15
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaghPR2QxuxHRnNjqrYYwuc0nf7NRboPbZz7N7SVO6oCg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 2:36 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> I'd like to think about this stuff in a different way: this is useful
> if enabled by default because it can also help in finding out error
> paths that should not use the internal errcode. Normally, there
> should be zero backtraces produced, except in unexpected
> never-to-be-reached cases.

That's long been my feeling about this. So, if we revert this for now,
what we ought to do is put it back right ASAP after feature freeze and
then clean all that up.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-04-22 13:33:37 Re: promotion related handling in pg_sync_replication_slots()
Previous Message Japin Li 2024-04-22 13:24:29 Re: Support event trigger for logoff