| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points |
| Date: | 2012-07-03 15:28:50 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoafwqpO1_iNDLmUdn-j_HeunF_kzWy_1ricW7DoNjEmaA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Alexander Korotkov
<aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Attached patch fixes GiST behaviour without altering operators behaviour.
>
>
> I think we definitely should apply this patch before 9.2 release, because it
> is a bug fix. Otherwise people will continue produce incorrect GiST indexes
> with in-core geometrical opclasses until 9.3. Patch is very simple and only
> changes few lines of code.
>
> Any thoughts?
Do we need to apply this patch to 9.2?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2012-07-03 15:33:09 | Re: User-Id Tracking when Portal was started |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-07-03 15:21:31 | TODO list updated for 9.3 |