Re: SPI_connect, SPI_connect_ext return type

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stepan Neretin <sndcppg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SPI_connect, SPI_connect_ext return type
Date: 2024-09-09 16:29:20
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoae9oML6u9VO-qm2DEvCokOf-nO9WmwWF4xjekTYx=vVQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 12:20 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I too think it's good to go. If no one complains or asks for
> > more time to review, I will push it Monday or so.
>
> And done.

I didn't see this thread until after the commit had already happened,
but a belated +1 for this and any other cruft removal we can do in
SPI-land.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-09-09 17:00:59 Re: access numeric data in module
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-09-09 16:19:58 Re: SPI_connect, SPI_connect_ext return type