| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Releasing in September |
| Date: | 2016-01-25 15:45:32 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoae52MXdrkwiJds6qr_xvjKqtf2AxMLewATjjBW3kQmzw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> This signal is common, particularly for smaller patches, and it ought to
> remain common. The product would advance slowly if every contrib module or
> vacuumdb flag took full attention from two committers. Every release has a
> few patches that do deserve this level of attention, though, and they rarely
> attract it. Index-only scans did; commit a2822fb had a non-author committer
> despite an author having a commit bit.
Yeah, I was a bit surprised when Tom committed that, but I was
pleased. I didn't have huge confidence in it at that point, and
having Tom come along and give a hand was a great relief. I think he
not only committed the base patch but improved a very healthy number
of things about it as well.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2016-01-25 15:47:37 | Unbreak mbregression test |
| Previous Message | Corey Huinker | 2016-01-25 15:11:19 | Re: Add generate_series(date, date) and generate_series(date, date, integer) |