Re: segfault in hot standby for hash indexes

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: segfault in hot standby for hash indexes
Date: 2017-03-27 16:55:00
Message-ID: CA+TgmoadgZa3qicOO64VwTF8ajuMtreTP1GDnWJWpb5bGogeQw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:49 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think it would have been probably okay to use *int* for ntuples as
>>> that matches with what you are actually assigning in the function.
>>
>> okay, corrected it. Attached is newer version of patch.
>
> Thanks, this version looks good to me.

Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-03-27 17:01:11 Re: logical replication launcher crash on buildfarm
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-03-27 16:50:23 Re: logical replication launcher crash on buildfarm