| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jacob Burroughs <jburroughs(at)instructure(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |
| Date: | 2024-04-05 14:04:19 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoadaSis7F11L1Sbo25567CPqK=dZaV0stLVQbxtXrYmeg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 1:10 PM Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
> Attached is a rebased patchset
We should keep talking about this, but I think we're far too close to
the wire at this point to think about committing anything for v17 at
this point. These are big changes, they haven't been thoroughly
reviewed by anyone AFAICT, and we don't have consensus on what we
ought to be doing. I know that's probably not what you want to hear,
but realistically, I think that's the only reasonable decision at this
point.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2024-04-05 14:12:46 | Re: meson vs windows perl |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-04-05 14:02:08 | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |