| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
| Date: | 2015-08-18 17:01:29 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoadWzS=WbP_aJL5B=pnmbZsnjSwrX8njK=fJJoGfQYXQA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Jaime Casanova
<jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> This is not completely true, you can always use something like
> pgbouncer or other middleware to change the server to which clients
> connect. you still need to solve the fact that you will have a
> read-only server at the other side.
>
> something like repmgr + pgbouncer will work fine.
Sure, but pgbouncer is an extra hop, and has its own foibles. There's
real appeal to doing this in the client.
> i agree that once/if we ever have multimaster included then this could
> be a good idea
I think it has a lot of appeal *now*.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-08-18 17:04:27 | Re: [patch] psql tab completion for grant execute |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2015-08-18 16:53:28 | Re: Proposal: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Balázs Zsoldos | 2015-08-18 18:54:19 | Concurrent read and write access of LargeObject via getBlob() can raise exception |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2015-08-18 16:53:28 | Re: Proposal: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |