| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Jason Petersen <jason(at)citusdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression |
| Date: | 2017-05-19 12:31:15 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoadW_JQRSCn4qCQE1FsD+FNwzW+_cLdHDnMf6Qk+S1XiQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> There's still weird behaviour, unfortunately. If you do an ALTER
> SEQUENCE changing minval/maxval w/ restart in a transaction, and abort,
> you'll a) quite possibly not be able to use the sequence anymore,
> because it may of bounds b) DDL still isn't transactional.
Your emails would be a bit easier to understand if you included a few
more words.
I'm guessing "may of bounds" is supposed to say "may be out of bounds"?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | asotolongo | 2017-05-19 15:05:11 | BUG #14661: authentication behavior(SCRAM-MD5) |
| Previous Message | Zakharov, Andrey | 2017-05-19 10:57:51 | Update doesnt process the changes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-05-19 13:33:04 | Re: Get stuck when dropping a subscription during synchronizing table |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-19 12:28:06 | Re: [POC] Faster processing at Gather node |