From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Dynamic Background Workers and clean exit |
Date: | 2014-04-16 16:25:20 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoacToGZkShcf0MdzmpxOpOc2qa_iKmkAkNW-h384zVzBg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been recently doing some work with dynamic bgworkers and noticed that I
> have no way of saying "I am done now and want to exit cleanly" because
> bgworkers get restarted automatically on exit code 0 no matter what is the
> restart interval set to.
>
> I understand the rationale for this behavior when using static bgworkers
> which are meant to run forever, but dynamic ones are spawned dynamically by
> code so they should also be able to terminate cleanly as they have
> presumably finite work to do. Also I think the clean shutdown of dynamic
> bgworker should not be logged (or at least not with the same log level as it
> is now) since it's business as usual.
>
> Since the dyanamic bgworkers are new in 9.4 the behavior can still be
> changed.
>
> Thoughts?
See the other thread where this is being discussed...
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-04-16 16:26:23 | AF_UNSPEC vs PF_UNSPEC |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-04-16 16:24:15 | Re: Proposal: variant of regclass |