Re: Parallel worker error

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel worker error
Date: 2017-08-30 11:41:18
Message-ID: CA+TgmoabX2i3Wef2v7Bn7NYYxO1zG23icMcGwA6k4s0gK-gOxQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Pavan Deolasee
<pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> It's quite possible that I don't understand the differences in "role" and
> "session authorization", but it still looks like a bug to me. May be
> SerializeGUCState() should check if SetRoleIsActive is true and only then
> save the role information?

Ugh. Well, this is definitely a bug, but I'm not sure if that's the right fix.

Mutually interdependent GUCs are bad news.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-08-30 11:47:45 Re: Parallel worker error
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-08-30 11:39:34 Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90