Re: "Some tests to cover hash_index"

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "Some tests to cover hash_index"
Date: 2016-09-20 15:25:11
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoab4OLrX9ztyW_AZuumjzLD8E0vsSwBaWLDp0d3oDahQw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think you have a point, but not sure if it is worth to add a
> separate file. It might be tricky to choose which file to add new
> tests for hash_indexes. Anybody else have opinion on this point?

I think all the tests should be added to hash_index.sql. A new file
doesn't seem warranted.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-09-20 15:27:59 Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2016-09-20 15:20:35 Re: Hash Indexes