Re: [v9.2] sepgsql's DROP Permission checks

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [v9.2] sepgsql's DROP Permission checks
Date: 2012-03-09 20:19:24
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoaase1GWJvROEX6WZ-ObWs1RtzoyZbuj6azp8OsqFFrtA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
>> OK, I modified the patch according to your suggestions.
>>
>> object_access_hook was extended to take an argument of void * pointer,
>> and InvokeObjectAccessHook was also allows to deliver it.
>
> Sorry for the long radio silence on this patch.  The changes to the
> object-access hook stuff seem sound to me now, so I've gone ahead and
> committed that part of this.  I'll look at the rest next.

That looks fine also, so committed that too.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-03-09 20:21:51 Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-03-09 20:15:43 Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?