From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
Cc: | PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [v9.2] sepgsql's DROP Permission checks |
Date: | 2012-03-09 20:19:24 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoaase1GWJvROEX6WZ-ObWs1RtzoyZbuj6azp8OsqFFrtA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
>> OK, I modified the patch according to your suggestions.
>>
>> object_access_hook was extended to take an argument of void * pointer,
>> and InvokeObjectAccessHook was also allows to deliver it.
>
> Sorry for the long radio silence on this patch. The changes to the
> object-access hook stuff seem sound to me now, so I've gone ahead and
> committed that part of this. I'll look at the rest next.
That looks fine also, so committed that too.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-03-09 20:21:51 | Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-03-09 20:15:43 | Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER? |