Re: walsender & parallelism

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: walsender & parallelism
Date: 2017-04-25 15:18:35
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoaaj1jVHY4HgRR-dQP9WVWQzppSBtdYU9Cb+enfS6GaMA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> This'd be easier to look at if the fairly separate facility of allowing
> walsender to execute SQL commands had been committed separately, rather
> than as part of a fairly large commit of largely unrelated things.

Good grief, yes. I really don't think that should have been slipped
into a commit that was mostly about logical replication, with only a
brief mention in the commit message and, AFAICS, no documentation
whatsoever.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2017-04-25 15:20:46 Re: PG 10 release notes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2017-04-25 15:17:23 Re: PG 10 release notes