From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 2017-03 Commitfest In Progress |
Date: | 2017-03-04 07:31:40 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaaQkL-+UHdvhfO6KXT+KkDApNd4dQ0YpqJmYG3Lx3WRA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Fix the optimization to skip WAL-logging on table created in the same
>> transaction (originally submitted to CommitFest 2016-03)
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/13/528/
>> Michael perhaps-unwisely set the committer on this one to Heikki,
>> which led me and perhaps other committers to think he was going to
>> take care of it. But he may not have intended to do that; it's best to
>> let committers claim patches for themselves rather than assign them.
>> That having been said, I think it's bad when a known data-corrupting
>> bug goes unfixed for a year and a half
>
> FWIW, at the end of the thread Heikki has mentioned that he would move
> those patches forward to commit, so setting him as the owner looked
> quite adapted at this time.
Ah, OK. So I'd say your action was justified, then, but in light of
the amount of time that's gone by, I think we might need to find
another vi^Holunteer.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-04 08:23:23 | Re: Cost model for parallel CREATE INDEX |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-04 07:29:26 | Re: Proposal : Parallel Merge Join |