Re: Queries that should be canceled will get stuck on secure_write function

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: 蔡梦娟(玊于) <mengjuan(dot)cmj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Queries that should be canceled will get stuck on secure_write function
Date: 2021-08-23 18:45:19
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaaNQNaL=_3RzudUSzSWrfG_uyj_CuF52HyGsjWuR0-eg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:26 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Aren't we talking about query cancellations that occur in response to a
> standby delay limit? Those aren't in response to user action.

Oh, you're right. But I guess a similar problem could also occur in
response to pg_terminate_backend(), no?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Platon Pronko 2021-08-23 18:46:57 Re: very long record lines in expanded psql output
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-08-23 18:42:17 Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers)