Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Adrien NAYRAT <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode
Date: 2019-02-26 17:26:49
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa_fJXnrh1jwnJ_=Xwkmy2md7m7xSKtxut3XEY6hyUs-g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:20 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> So, let me clarify the situations;
>
> (1) If backup_label and recovery.signal exist, the recovery starts safely.
> This is the normal case of recovery from the base backup.
>
> (2)If backup_label.pending and recovery.signal exist, as described above,
> PANIC error happens at the start of recovery. This case can happen
> if the operator forgets to rename backup_label.pending, i.e.,
> operation mistake. So, after PANIC, the operator needs to fix her or
> his mistake (i.e., rename backup_label.pending) and restart
> the recovery.
>
> (3) If backup_label.pending exists but recovery.signal doesn't, the server
> ignores (or removes) backup_label.pending and do the recovery
> starting the pg_control's REDO location. This case can happen if
> the server crashes while an exclusive backup is in progress.
> So crash-in-the-middle-of-backup doesn't prevent the recovery from
> starting in this idea.

The if-conditions for 1 and 2 appear to be the same, which is confusing.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2019-02-26 17:29:09 Re: No-rewrite timestamp<->timestamptz conversions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-02-26 17:25:19 Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY