From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Disabled features on Hot Standby |
Date: | 2012-01-13 15:36:32 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaZo8OJjgrCKBucudzSRZxWxhMB6c8N6rrzP2rz7Zbu_w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> wrote:
> Perhaps it would be possible to keep older copies of pages around when there are older transactions running on the standby?
I've thought about that... it's basically a rollback segment, which
for that matter might be judged superior to what we do on the master
(i.e. VACUUM). Needless to say, that would be just a teensy bit more
work than we're likely to have time for in 9.2. But maybe for 10.2...
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-01-13 15:41:45 | Re: show Heap Fetches in EXPLAIN for index-only scans |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-01-13 15:31:42 | Re: show Heap Fetches in EXPLAIN for index-only scans |