| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com, shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows |
| Date: | 2024-01-05 19:58:55 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaYOON0cQPR0Aj_ZD2005+sschuMisSQV7xPqzxrx7vaQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 4:28 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> In the attached, fixed the existing two messages, and adjusted one
> message to display an error code, all in the consistent format.
Hi,
I'm not a Windows expert, but my guess is that 0001 is a very good
idea. I hope someone who is a Windows expert will comment on that.
0002 seems problematic to me. One potential issue is that it would
break if someone renamed postgres.exe to something else -- although
that's probably not really a serious problem. A bigger issue is that
it seems like it would break if someone used pg_ctl to start several
instances in different data directories on the same machine. If I'm
understanding correctly, that currently mostly works, and this would
break it.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2024-01-05 20:00:00 | Re: Add a perl function in Cluster.pm to generate WAL |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2024-01-05 19:47:09 | Re: Emit fewer vacuum records by reaping removable tuples during pruning |