From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(dot)hagander(at)redpill-linpro(dot)com>, Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` |
Date: | 2024-03-26 12:11:33 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaX_XJMORzkTvG0D6+KZP4mYUSq1Paa8YOSmZUy0=tJSQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 5:04 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > > Isn't "configuration" too generic a term for disabling ALTER SYSTEM?
> >
> > maybe "externally_managed_auto_config"
>
> How many people associate "auto" with ALTER SYSTEM? I assume not many.
>
> To me, externally_managed_configuration is promising a lot more than it
> delivers because there is still a lot of ocnfiguration it doesn't
> control. I am also confused why the purpose of the feature, external
> management of configuation, is part of the variable name. We usually
> name parameters for what they control.
I actually agree with this. I wasn't going to quibble with it because
other people seemed to like it. But I think something like
allow_alter_system would be better, as it would describe the exact
thing that the parameter does, rather than how we think the parameter
ought to be used.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-03-26 12:15:25 | Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` |
Previous Message | Tender Wang | 2024-03-26 12:00:36 | Can't find not null constraint, but \d+ shows that |