From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance |
Date: | 2016-12-19 16:53:05 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaXXKQe0AZJmAFL5gRWz+oPJmK+WHFfkKqYW7WpVmaUqA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Any particular reason not to change inhOpt to be a simple boolean, and
> remove the enum?
No, no particular reason. I thought about it, but I didn't really see
any advantage in getting rid of the typedef.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-12-19 17:24:38 | Re: Creating a DSA area to provide work space for parallel execution |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-12-19 16:48:48 | Re: Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance |