Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE
Date: 2015-05-14 00:58:46
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaXBO5Hk8nAiN=QJAEGDOF22jqBKy5JM8Gg3RGsMYeDng@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The v15 patch emits a line for each table when reindexing multiple
> tables, and emits a line for each index when reindexing single table.
> But v14 patch emits a line for each index, regardless of reindex target.
> Should I change back to v14 patch?

Uh, maybe. What made you change it?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-05-14 01:01:43 Re: Manipulating complex types as non-contiguous structures in-memory
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-05-14 00:53:01 Re: Manipulating complex types as non-contiguous structures in-memory