| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Within CF app, "Bug Fixes" should be "Bug Fixes/Refactoring" |
| Date: | 2015-11-06 04:47:20 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaWcGytGQ2eJsWq-T_x2DAvqkDNvRmN-trMasf-EH_F_g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>>> "Refactoring" seems rather a narrow definition of what might show up
>>> in such a category, btw. Maybe "Code Beautification" would be a
>>> suitable title? I'm bikeshedding though.
>>
>> I think that there is value in limiting the number of topics. But I
>> hardly but much weight on this. Any of the above are fine.
>
> Can someone follow up and push this to the CF app? "Refactoring" seems
> to be the consensus.
I guess I'm wondering whether there's really enough of this to need
its own category.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2015-11-06 04:54:44 | Getting sorted data from foreign server for merge join |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2015-11-06 04:46:27 | Re: NOTIFY in Background Worker |