Re: checkpoint_flush_after documentation inconsistency

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: checkpoint_flush_after documentation inconsistency
Date: 2016-04-23 03:33:07
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaW8H04T1_6p7BHa673JXh5J9FY58JFhEdq3AgMrZnS=Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2016-04-18 14:33:28 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> > The documentation says that the default value is 128Kb on Linux, but the
>> > code says it's 256Kb.
>> >
>> > Not sure which one is correct, but the other one should be updated :) I'm
>> > guessing it's a copy/paste mistake in the docs, but since I'm not sure I'm
>> > not just pushing a fix.
>>
>> I think you're right.
>>
>> I also found another several small problems regarding XXX_flush_after
>> parameters.
>
> Thanks for finding these, once I'm back home/office from pgconf.nyc
> (tonight / tomorrow) I'll push a fix.

Ping.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-04-23 03:37:02 Re: checkpoint_flush_after documentation inconsistency
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2016-04-23 03:04:25 Re: snapshot too old, configured by time