From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal: template-ify (binary) extensions |
Date: | 2013-07-16 19:35:01 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaVxgNt-tLMi6wH75qcoxqa-qGu4Z1v7ADBzWR7qL1NrQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> wrote:
> But okay, you're saying we *have* and *want* a guarantee that even a
> superuser cannot execute arbitrary native code via libpq (at least in
> default installs w/o extensions).
Yes, that's a good way of summarizing my position. I think I'd
support having an extension that allows that, although I don't think
I'd want such an extension installed on any machine I administer. But
I oppose having it be something the server allows by default. YMMV.
:-)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-07-16 20:04:49 | Re: review: Non-recursive processing of AND/OR lists |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-07-16 19:26:37 | Re: Differences in WHERE clause of SELECT |