From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Safe memory allocation functions |
Date: | 2015-01-15 14:55:08 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaVHNf3k=6Drq8ZGcuVfgjvGNA3k6osM0G8Ep0CX8B7Sg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2015-01-15 08:40:34 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I do think that "safe" is the wrong suffix. Maybe palloc_soft_fail()
>> or palloc_null() or palloc_no_oom() or palloc_unsafe().
>
> palloc_or_null()?
That'd work for me, too.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Timmer, Marius | 2015-01-15 15:05:54 | Re: [PATCH] explain sortorder |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-01-15 14:54:23 | Re: parallel mode and parallel contexts |