| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Explain buffers wrong counter with parallel plans |
| Date: | 2018-06-08 18:04:26 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaUuNJNHofvpFe9dNK7iLo58P7Qv3z_A-Zif4odOkvZaw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> So, apparently this is not a Postgres 11 open item, but rather a bug
> that goes back to pg10. However, maybe it would be worth fixing soon
> anyway? In particular, if we want to perturb the explain output as
> suggested upthread, maybe *that* should be considered an open item?
>
> Anyway, this has stalled for a month now.
Yeah. I'm not willing to do anything here unilaterally. There is
neither universal agreement that there is a problem here nor agreement
on a fix. Unless that changes, I don't know what to do here.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-06-08 18:06:46 | Re: file cloning in pg_upgrade and CREATE DATABASE |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-06-08 18:03:38 | Re: hot_standby_feedback vs excludeVacuum and snapshots |