From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_amcheck contrib application |
Date: | 2021-04-01 17:41:50 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaUf5Yq+jN+rJdhSe+G4kzQywTk-LYmsPnCpTZZyZSVrg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 1:24 PM Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Apr 1, 2021, at 10:20 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > OK, let's try that again.
> Looks good!
OK, committed. We still need to deal with what you had as 0003
upthread, so I guess the next step is for me to spend some time
reviewing that one.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-04-01 17:46:37 | Re: libpq debug log |
Previous Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-04-01 17:24:24 | Re: pg_amcheck contrib application |