| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | thomas(dot)berger(at)1und1(dot)de, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty() |
| Date: | 2016-08-23 18:49:57 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaTQF551YfaMZvOr=y=EXdE1eW3kuc7+y2eEGdLcqY7tw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Well, the patch was updated several times, and the final version was not
> objected to until you objected.
It is not clear what you mean by "the final version", because you
posted two different final versions. I don't see a clear vote from
anybody in favor of either of those things, and Peter's replies seem
to me to suggest that he does not support either of your proposals.
So I am not sure that I would agree with the statement that nobody
objected, but in any case there certainly wasn't a consensus in favor
of either change.
Also, the subject of this thread is "wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty",
which may not have tipped people off to the fact that you were
proposing to replace "kB" with "KB" everywhere. Even after reading
your email, I didn't realize that you were proposing that until I
actually opened the patch and looked at it. Such widespread changes
tend to draw objections, and IMHO shouldn't be made unless it's
abundantly clear that most people are in favor.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-08-23 19:26:55 | Re: View data in PgAdmin III 1.22.1 |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-08-23 18:37:34 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty() |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-08-23 18:53:42 | Re: dsm_unpin_segment |
| Previous Message | Shay Rojansky | 2016-08-23 18:42:14 | Re: Slowness of extended protocol |