| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes |
| Date: | 2017-03-15 14:53:50 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaRdW81yX1o+QkWAMAoC_pO=nXxTbkWFmXuChGhOAdBJg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> We didn't found any issue with the above testing.
>>
>> Great! I've committed the latest version of the patch, with some
>> cosmetic changes.
>>
>
> Thanks a lot. I have noticed that the test case patch for "snapshot
> too old" is not committed. Do you want to leave that due to timing
> requirement or do you want me to submit it separately so that we can
> deal with it separately and may take an input from Kevin?
I've committed that now as well. Let's see what the buildfarm thinks.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-03-15 14:55:06 | Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-15 14:51:36 | Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes |